I think my romantic sensibilities have been fed on an unhealthy diet for too long. Consider-- if you give a girl from kindergarten up access to tales and portrayals of true love, and living solely for the purpose of ideals, what else can you expect but that she can’t tolerate the grey trivialities of dating? I had a two hour chat last night on ‘shoes and ships’ with my beloved Tiffa, and among our many brushes on universal truths, we brought up love.
There’s nothing more delightfully old-fashioned than sitting in my room, just chatting. The empty chilliness of the basement would lend itself wonderfully to a softly flickering fire. All we needed last night was two mugs of hot chocolate that would swirl in delicate traces of flavour in the last of the drink. And as I rested my head against my hand and brought up the rose-red mystery of girlhood romance, I couldn’t help but feel this was the sort of scene that, properly set, would precede a meeting in a film.
But, I digress, and rather painfully too. I glanced up as we spoke to study the uneven lines of wealth that predominate my bookshelves. Jane Austen, L.M. Montgomery, Louisa May Alcott, the Brontes-- all the great romantics in history, and I hold them dear. My soul thrills to stories of shyly budding love between the poets. I replay the classic lines and moments in my head. When Colonel Brandon reads to Marianne “for there is nothing lost/that may be found/if sought. . .” with that gently brushing voice of his, and she looks up at him. Her eyes just fill with the slowly dawning realization that love is not a glimmering chance to be snatched only once in a lifetime. I’m someone who ‘can never love by halves,’ but will I survive the inevitable pain of learning ideals in favor of reality?
When Satine is lying in Christian’s arms, her eyes closed as she gently strokes his shoulder, I can’t help but dream about the kind of complete intimacy that so rarely happens across lovers in today’s world. When Rose and Jack kiss on the bow of the Titanic, I feel caught up as completely in the moment as if it was me flying into the horizon of the future as my fingers timidly touch another’s. The examples stretch the barriers of drama and comedy, but it’s always the same underlying thought. I want that.
I know people say that we should be idealists at twenty, but we’re fools if our minds haven’t conformed to realism by forty. But why should passion have to fade as the years rob every other charm of its youthful bloom? Surely it should be as natural and flowing as the cycles of the sun, rising with a pale-stained glory of cloud and light, ebbing out into a constant brilliance and drawing to a close with sunset. There’s a richer, deeper quality of the sun’s setting than its rise. Shouldn’t love echo the source of life?
I’ve never been in love. Not what I consider to be that oft dreamed of emotion, at any rate. Surely there are as many facets to love as there are those heralded diamonds? I believe it should be as wistful as a single blossom falling to the ground, tranquil like the steam that curls up from Japanese teacups, as tumultuous as a wind-tossed branch crying about in a wind, and soft like the warm scent of summer on a June afternoon.
But then, I never could live by halves. No, I either plunge headlong into something with all the creative abandon a poet could desire, or I . . . hold back. Afraid. I distrust compromises and moderates. So I refuse to dedicate my life to the pursuit of a love that will diminish to an regretful silence. Alise told me once that I would either fall deeply in love or never marry. She was right. I’ll never live a dream half-heartedly fufilled. I won’t sacrifice.
Now that I’m done being Victorian (I am really quite Victorian, aren’t I? Always dashing off italics and being too lavish with descriptions. It’s enjoyable) I’ll tell you something awful about myself.
I’m vain.
No, I really am. When Cordelia says lovely things like: “Okay, as you all know by now, I'm obsessed with Camille's blog. However, no matter what I do, I just cannot copy that beautiful, poetic style of writing that she projects in every single one of her entries” or Sea is an absolute darling about this humble heart o’ a poet, I can’t help but flush a little with pride. Surely it’s not healthy for an aspiring writer, but it’s still a great comfort!
I have to put in a good word for both of their blogs, though, not only by the virtue of returning the favor, but also the delight it is to read them. Sea’s ‘happy little serendipity’ is a mostly undiscovered corner of joy. It’s like a colourful bouquet of flowers-- a few wilting with the pressures of everyday life, but mostly half-opened blossoms that are filled with promise. Cordelia’s sunroom is scattered with Edwardian treasures and the richness of velvet. It’s a comfortable mix of prose and poetry that make up my favorite journals of bits and bytes.
This is running on two pages, and I do want to work on a few gems of fiction before I surrender to the temptation of chocolate chip cookies and a period drama, so, as the French say-- au revoir!
There’s nothing more delightfully old-fashioned than sitting in my room, just chatting. The empty chilliness of the basement would lend itself wonderfully to a softly flickering fire. All we needed last night was two mugs of hot chocolate that would swirl in delicate traces of flavour in the last of the drink. And as I rested my head against my hand and brought up the rose-red mystery of girlhood romance, I couldn’t help but feel this was the sort of scene that, properly set, would precede a meeting in a film.
But, I digress, and rather painfully too. I glanced up as we spoke to study the uneven lines of wealth that predominate my bookshelves. Jane Austen, L.M. Montgomery, Louisa May Alcott, the Brontes-- all the great romantics in history, and I hold them dear. My soul thrills to stories of shyly budding love between the poets. I replay the classic lines and moments in my head. When Colonel Brandon reads to Marianne “for there is nothing lost/that may be found/if sought. . .” with that gently brushing voice of his, and she looks up at him. Her eyes just fill with the slowly dawning realization that love is not a glimmering chance to be snatched only once in a lifetime. I’m someone who ‘can never love by halves,’ but will I survive the inevitable pain of learning ideals in favor of reality?
When Satine is lying in Christian’s arms, her eyes closed as she gently strokes his shoulder, I can’t help but dream about the kind of complete intimacy that so rarely happens across lovers in today’s world. When Rose and Jack kiss on the bow of the Titanic, I feel caught up as completely in the moment as if it was me flying into the horizon of the future as my fingers timidly touch another’s. The examples stretch the barriers of drama and comedy, but it’s always the same underlying thought. I want that.
I know people say that we should be idealists at twenty, but we’re fools if our minds haven’t conformed to realism by forty. But why should passion have to fade as the years rob every other charm of its youthful bloom? Surely it should be as natural and flowing as the cycles of the sun, rising with a pale-stained glory of cloud and light, ebbing out into a constant brilliance and drawing to a close with sunset. There’s a richer, deeper quality of the sun’s setting than its rise. Shouldn’t love echo the source of life?
I’ve never been in love. Not what I consider to be that oft dreamed of emotion, at any rate. Surely there are as many facets to love as there are those heralded diamonds? I believe it should be as wistful as a single blossom falling to the ground, tranquil like the steam that curls up from Japanese teacups, as tumultuous as a wind-tossed branch crying about in a wind, and soft like the warm scent of summer on a June afternoon.
But then, I never could live by halves. No, I either plunge headlong into something with all the creative abandon a poet could desire, or I . . . hold back. Afraid. I distrust compromises and moderates. So I refuse to dedicate my life to the pursuit of a love that will diminish to an regretful silence. Alise told me once that I would either fall deeply in love or never marry. She was right. I’ll never live a dream half-heartedly fufilled. I won’t sacrifice.
Now that I’m done being Victorian (I am really quite Victorian, aren’t I? Always dashing off italics and being too lavish with descriptions. It’s enjoyable) I’ll tell you something awful about myself.
I’m vain.
No, I really am. When Cordelia says lovely things like: “Okay, as you all know by now, I'm obsessed with Camille's blog. However, no matter what I do, I just cannot copy that beautiful, poetic style of writing that she projects in every single one of her entries” or Sea is an absolute darling about this humble heart o’ a poet, I can’t help but flush a little with pride. Surely it’s not healthy for an aspiring writer, but it’s still a great comfort!
I have to put in a good word for both of their blogs, though, not only by the virtue of returning the favor, but also the delight it is to read them. Sea’s ‘happy little serendipity’ is a mostly undiscovered corner of joy. It’s like a colourful bouquet of flowers-- a few wilting with the pressures of everyday life, but mostly half-opened blossoms that are filled with promise. Cordelia’s sunroom is scattered with Edwardian treasures and the richness of velvet. It’s a comfortable mix of prose and poetry that make up my favorite journals of bits and bytes.
This is running on two pages, and I do want to work on a few gems of fiction before I surrender to the temptation of chocolate chip cookies and a period drama, so, as the French say-- au revoir!
